Trends in Nursing Education: Spring 2024 Findings

A comparative analysis of 2022 and 2024 survey insights from nursing education programs across the United States.
Trends Whitepaper Cover

At CORE Higher Education Group, we consistently engage with academic professionals who express a range of challenges and trends associated with nursing education. These challenges span various aspects of program administration—from managing student enrollment and facilitating preceptor participation to navigating accreditation requirements and standards set by agencies such as by the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). Such issues underscore the complexities of operating nursing education programs and highlight the critical need for effective solutions to streamline these processes.

The Methodology

In 2022, CORE worked with The University of Connecticut School of Nursing to conduct a comprehensive survey among nursing programs within colleges and universities in the United States to evaluate the landscape of nursing education. Nearly two years have passed since that initial assessment, prompting a reevaluation to discern ongoing and emergent trends within the sector.

With the execution of a follow-up survey, CORE aims to delineate continuities and changes in the field, thereby offering a nuanced understanding of the current state of nursing education. For the review and analysis of this whitepaper, we worked with with Dr. Crystel Farina, Associate Dean for BSN Programs and Assistant Professor at George Washington University in 2024.

Competency-Based Education

Tracking Student Competency

As we analyze the progression from 2022 to 2024, it becomes evident that what was once a preparatory query regarding competency-based learning has now evolved into an established practice within nursing education programs. Initially posed to gauge preparedness for competency-based learning, the question has since shifted to focus on the current methodologies employed to assess student competencies effectively.

The data reveals that many programs that were in the planning stages of implementing competency measurement in 2022 have now successfully integrated various effective methods. 

This transition underscores a significant advancement in educational strategies, reflecting a broader commitment to enhancing the measurement of student success and readiness.

competency tracking

Results from the 2024 survey.

student competency

Results from the 2022 survey.

Key Methods for Measuring Competency

Nursing student education-1The 2024 survey highlights four primary methods that nursing programs are using to measure student competency:

Course Outcomes & Objectives: Cited by 83% of respondents, this method remains a cornerstone of competency assessment, focusing on the specific achievements and skills gained through course completion.

Program Outcomes: Also noted by 83% of participants, this approach evaluates the broader educational objectives of the nursing program, ensuring that all graduates meet the established educational standards.

Accreditation Standards: Referenced by 71% of respondents, this method aligns student competencies with the requirements set by accrediting bodies, which is crucial for maintaining the educational quality and licensure eligibility.

Licensing Exam Pass Rates: Utilized by 59% of programs, the success rate on licensing exams like the NCLEX serves as a direct indicator of the practical application of learned competencies.

Additional methods reported include preparation exams such as ATI, cited by 39% of respondents, NCLEX categories by 27%, and QSEN criteria by 22%. These tools provide further nuanced insights into specific areas of competency and readiness. Furthermore, respondents in the 'Other' category mentioned using resources like Kaplan and Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs), highlighting the diversity of tools available to assess student performance comprehensively.

Placements and Scheduling

Externship logistics becomes the top challenge in Nursing Education

From the 2024 survey results, 42% of respondents identified the logistics of managing externships as their primary challenge, reflecting complexities in coordination and execution.

What are the contributing factors to this challenge? 

Here are some of the individual responses around externship logistics to answer that question:

  • “Sites limiting student numbers, the amount of requirements for students to attend clinicals and they are different amongst sites.”
  • “Lack of facilities to participate in instructor-led clinicals. Limit on the number of students allowed in a group. Day availability.”
  • “Providing students with quality hands-on practice in a healthy environment.”

It’s clear the logistics of providing students with placement are wide-ranging and challenging for programs.

Additionally, we learned that 78% of respondents reported that sites are limiting the number of students per placement site in 2024 compared to 39% in 2022. That makes student limits a much larger challenge than competition against other schools for preceptors right now - though both were comparably chosen. Additionally, this increases costs to academic institutions requiring the hiring of additional clinical instructors to support fewer students on a unit. 

Watch the webinar recording to learn from Stephanie Cuozzo and Dr. Crystel Farina as they discuss the pivotal findings from the whitepaper, "Trends in Nursing Education: Spring 2024 Findings." This webinar is designed for nursing education professionals who are eager to stay ahead of the curve and implement effective approaches within their programs. Whether you are a program director, faculty member, or an administrator in nursing education, you will find this discussion invaluable.

2024 Trends in Nursing Education Webinar Screenshot (1)
nursing preceptors

High Quality Simulations

Currently Trending: High Quality Patient Simulators

The utilization of high quality simulation in nursing education has seen a slight increase, indicating a growing acceptance and integration of this technology as a critical educational tool. In 2022, a substantial majority, 91% of respondents, reported utilizing high quality simulation in their programs. By 2024, this figure had risen modestly to 95%, suggesting a steady but slow progression in its adoption. Additionally, when asked via an open text response, survey respondents described the increased availability of Next Gen Resources, including advancements in simulations as one of the most positive trends in nursing education today.

These trends reflect an overall positive trajectory towards the normalization and potentially deeper integration of high quality simulation within nursing education curricula, supporting its critical role in enhancing clinical competence and preparedness among students. These trends also reflect the National Council of State Boards of Nursing’s recognition that high quality simulation is an acceptable replacement for direct patient care (Hayden, et al., 2012). 

Trends in Nursing Charts

Preceptors

Trends in Preceptorship

In our 2022 survey, 61% indicated their programs were experiencing some level of decline related to finding preceptors. The two driving factors then impacting the decline across all respondents were competition with other programs and preceptors changing positions/ changes to their availability.

Fast forward to 2024, and the preceptor pool challenge isn’t getting any better, but also isn’t getting much worse, either. In 2022, 32% of respondents cited their preceptor pool was holding steady. In our survey this spring, 44% of respondents noted their pool is holding steady. 

Moreover, there was a notable decrease in respondents who reported a significant decline in preceptor participation, from 30% in 2022 to 12% in 2024. This reduction could indicate that while the overall challenge of securing preceptors persists, the rate of decline has slowed, suggesting that some of the measures implemented by educational institutions to mitigate this issue might be starting to take effect.

CORE has spoken at length in various articles and webinars about the need to explore more incentives for preceptor participation, including checking whether your school can offer preceptors CEUs or advertise tax credits that may be available through your state by nurses becoming preceptors.

It should be noted that while the preceptor pool may be holding steady, the level of experience of preceptors has changed in certain areas of the country.  There are more preceptors with less than 2 years of clinical practice experience available and less availability of the experienced seasoned nurse.

Click the video below to view a clip from the webinar, Improving the Preceptor and Academic Program Relationship to Increase Site Retention. The entire webinar recording can be accessed here.

Feedback from Preceptors on Student Preparedness and Clinical Teaching

Nursing

In our survey, we sought to understand the primary concerns preceptors have regarding the nursing students they supervise. The data revealed that student preparedness remains a significant issue, with 26% of responses highlighting a deficiency in readiness for clinical environments.

Key Concerns: 

  • Lack of Essential Skills: Preceptors noted that students often lack critical communication and employability skills, which are vital for effective functioning in clinical settings.
  • Real-World Preparedness: There is a consensus among preceptors that students are not as well-prepared for real-world clinical demands as they could be. This gap affects their ability to integrate seamlessly into clinical teams.
  • Time Constraints and Educational Challenges: Preceptors frequently cited their limited time availability as a major barrier to providing thorough, hands-on instruction. This issue is compounded by the need for adequate compensation for their time and efforts, particularly noted among MSN-NP/DNP preceptors.

Additionally, inconsistency in clinical faculty—often attributed to turnover due to better-paying opportunities—impacts the continuity and quality of clinical education.

Resource Constraints at Clinical Sites: Clinical sites are often overwhelmed by the volume of student placements they are requested to accommodate, which can lead to scenarios where there are too many students and not enough preceptor time to go around. This overcrowding can dilute the learning experience for students and strain resources at clinical facilities.

These findings underscore the need for educational programs to enhance the preparation of nursing students to meet the demands of clinical practice.

Learn More With CORE

We encourage you to download the whitepaper to discover additional insights including enrollment trends, IPE requirements and tracking, hybrid learning, changes in coursework and so much more.

This white paper is meant to give you a well-informed, peer-to-peer resource as you assess the unique challenges of your program. It is our hope that the findings presented herein will resonate with your own experiences and observations within your academic environment. 

If you are looking for ways to optimize your clinical education processes, we're here to help!

 

Download the White Paper Here!

See how CORE can work for you

Learn more about how CORE can meet your program’s unique needs when you book a demo with one of our specialists.